Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2017 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Consequences of Madhurarasa Atiyoga: A Case–Control Study

Deshmukh P Nareshrao

Keywords : Madhurarasa, Risk factor,Karya-karaṇa vada

Citation Information : Nareshrao DP. Consequences of Madhurarasa Atiyoga: A Case–Control Study. J Res Ayurvedic Sci 2017; 1 (4):303-308.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10064-0031

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Intorduction: According to classical Ayurvedic texts, balanced intake of madhurarasa in diet helps to maintain physiological health, but its excessive intake produces some signs and symptoms, such as Sthoulya, Aalasya, Nidradhikya, Anannabhilasha Agnimandya, Anaha, Galaganda, Gaṇdamala, Gala Shopha, and Asyamadhurya. Aims and objectives: To establish the relationship between excessive use of madhurarasa and signs/symptoms produced by it. Materials and methods: A case–control survey study was planned wherein totally 356 volunteers were interviewed personally. Subjects with particular symptoms were considered as a case, while healthy volunteers were considered as controls. To measure the excessive intake of madhurarasa, the quantity and frequency of common food items, such as dairy products, corn, pasta, starchy vegetables, cream, wheat, rice, sweet potatoes, banana, and dates are taken into consideration. Data were arranged in a 2 × 2 table and odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each symptom. Results: Odds ratio for Sthoulya, Aalasya, Nidradhikya, Anannabhilasha Agnimandya, Anaha, Gala Shopha, and Asyamadhurya with 95% confidence interval (CI) was found to be 1.92 (1.17–3.1), 1.28 (0.68–2.45), 1.89 (1.03–3.47), 1.32 (0.70–2.47), 1.82 (1.13–2.96), 1.93 (1.09–3.44), 2 (1.16–3.45), and 1.93 (1.18–3.14) respectively. Conclusion: From the above-obtained results, it is concluded that madhurarasa is a risk factor for Sthoulya, Nidradhikya, Agnimandya, Anaha, Galashopha, and Asyamadhurya. The study supports the Ayurvedic classical claim regarding atiyoga of madhurarasa.


PDF Share
  1. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana, Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/9. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 488.
  2. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana, Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/44. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 508.
  3. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana, Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/42. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 504.
  4. Chakrapanidatta, Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Dipika Commentry, Chikitsasthana, Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/42(1). Acharya YT, editor. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2013. p. 143.
  5. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana, Ashtauninditiyadhyaya 21/5-9. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 411.
  6. Baghel, MS. WHO—DFC sponsored project on-developing guidelines for clinical research methodology in ayurveda. Gujarat: Institute for Postgraduate Teaching & Research in Ayurveda, Gujarat Ayurved University; 2011.
  7. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita Jalpakalpataru commentary by Shrigangadhar, Sutrasthasthana, 2nd part. Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/42. Narendranath Sengupta KS, Balaichandra Sengupta KS, editors. 3rd ed. Delhi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2009. p. 949.
  8. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Vimanasthana, Trividharogavisheshvigyaniya 4/8. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 707.
  9. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana, Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/42(1). Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 504.
  10. Vagbhata, Ashtanga Hridaya, Sutrasthana, Rasabhediyadhyaya 10/6-9. Tripathi B, editor. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2009. p. 153.
  11. Sushruta, Sushruta Samhita, Sutrasthana Rasavishesavigyaniyadhyaya 42/9. Shastri KA, editor. Part I. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2011. p. 202.
  12. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Sutrasthana Atreyabhadrakapyiyadhyaya 26/36. Sastri K, Chaturvedi G, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2005. p. 501.
  13. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 Aug;84(2):274-288.
  14. Agnivesha, Charaka, Charaka Samhita revised by Dridhabala, Chikitsasthana, Grahanidoshachikitsadhyaya 15/42-44. Shukla AV, Tripathi RD, editors. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthana; 2007. p. 367.
  15. Sushruta, Sushruta Samhita, Uttaratantra, Visucikapratishedh adhyaya 56/20. Sharma A, editor. Part III. 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthana; 2008. p. 465.
PDF Share